The Gaming Industry
Daily Report
The Gaming Industry
Weekly Report
The Gaming Sector... Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
The Daily Lodging Report
North America
The Daily Lodging Report
Asia–Pacific
  Annual Model Portfolio
Back To Homepage
Lodging Stock Model Portfolio




































































Annual Model Portfolio


2009 Model Portfolio - Introduction

In the past two Gaming Sector….Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow reports, we warned of coming problems. From the heightened competition on the East Coast of the U.S., the “addiction” Las Vegas casino companies were having to non-gaming revenue and the confusion of just what type of gaming market Macau really is, we warned that there could be problems. In 2006, investors ignored this, sending gaming stocks up to unrealistic levels, setting them up for a dramatic correction in 2007. The entire sector was rescued by the private equity craze, actions by well known investors such as Kirk Kerkorian and a completely unrealistic view of Macau and just how deep and profitable the market could be.

We expressed a lot of concern about these things last year but felt that gaming stock valuations had already begun to come down and most of these things were fixable. What we, nor anyone else, could have ever predicted was the destruction of the U.S. economy caused by a combination of the banks era of easy lending, and a private equity bubble burst coming together to cause one big massive disaster when the price of oil surged to an all time high and never expected levels. We can argue this until the cows come home but we spent the first half of 2008 warning subscribers that if oil jumped over $100 a barrel for too long, both the gaming sector and the economy were in big trouble. Just like when Las Vegas Sands traded over $140 and Wynn Resorts over $170, it was clear to see that something was not right in valuations. The difference was we could sell the shares of LVS and WYNN, there was not much we could do about how much oil impacted our daily lives except stay home. That kind of tells you why things like casinos, malls, hotels and anything else which needed people to visit had such a horrible late summer/fall.

A spike in oil prices to over $140 a barrel followed by a decline to under $40 sounds like something that would take place over a couple of years and couple of cycles. Instead this happened in just two seasons, spiking to the highs during the all important summer vacation months and plunging into late fall. Obviously all time high prices of gasoline would hurt the travel and leisure business segment but what it seemed like everyone forgot is that the high gas prices impacted everything and the cascade effect just brought economic growth to a screeching halt, tipping the housing market over, destroying financial firms and sending consumer confidence plunging.

Rather than rehash the painful impact on the overall stock market in 2008, let’s take a look at where we are today and what investors should be looking for. If you cut out July through September we would not be in bad shape as gas prices at $1.50 a gallon is a terrific sign for regional gaming operators in drive-to markets. The low oil prices should help the airlines but the problem is the activities that occurred during those three months in 2008 resulted in the highest unemployment, a credit market that froze up for three months and now could take six months to defrost. In terms of gaming, the drive-to convenience gambling markets should do fine but it could take anywhere from 6 to 18 months for Las Vegas to start showing any type of turnaround.

There is no quick fix for Las Vegas as the mistakes of the past are coming back to haunt them. We were not kidding when we warned about the “Newbies” that were taking over the Strip and now you see the results. The dependence on non-gaming revenue, implosion of the majority of low rolling properties, artificially inflated real estate values and the Newbies who thought there was nothing wrong with overpaying, the construction of billion - instead of hundreds of million - dollar developments caused an ethnic cleansing of the tourists and a reliance on business and convention customers and upper class to complete whales as customers.

The casinos are now kissing up to the tourists but at a steep price as room rates drop, comps go up and profit margins fall into an abyss. For some reason there are still plenty out there who cannot figure out how casino/hotels in Las Vegas can still run at 90% occupancy yet operating profits have disappeared. The reality of the situation is that, just as we warned over the years, there was too much leverage in that non-gaming revenue and the casino companies turned the Strip into a cyclical environment, sort of a macro version of the U.S. economy.

The locals market suffered from the fall-out on the LV Strip. The combination of Las Vegas becoming the poster child for the subprime mortgage mess, declining home values and foreclosures, to the cancellation of development projects putting construction workers on furlough, gave the first dose of problems to the previously impervious locals operators. Once new properties such as Eastside Cannery and Aliante Station opened, the camel’s back found too many straws on it. Unfortunately, even if we see some stabilization of the housing market and home values, there is still more capacity coming online with the upcoming opening of the billion dollar M Resort. The LV Strip will see the opening of CityCenter, supposedly by the end of 2009 but we think there is a 30 to 40 percent chance it winds up being delayed until 2010. This will give Strip operators an entire year, from the opening of Encore from WYNN in late December 2008, to try to figure out how to fix the problems affecting the Strip. The comfort is in the fact that Las Vegas has always rebounded no matter who was involved. The only warning we can give is that the Las Vegas Strip of today has no resemblance to anything in its past. The casino operators are basically in the put up or shut up mode and investors will have to keep their ear to the ground to see who has the management, financial savvy and experience to make it through this.

While investors have every reason to feel concerned about Las Vegas, and Atlantic City for that matter, they are once again failing to give credit to those companies operating in certain regional markets. This is not anything out of the ordinary as with the exception of a few brief and spectacular months after 9/11, investors have always viewed the regional markets and their operators as going the way Las Vegas goes. This is the reason why there are so many Newbies on the LV Strip and why companies like Pinnacle Entertainment, Ameristar Casinos and Penn National Gaming have indicated interest in the past at getting on the LV Strip. Investors always seemed to give higher valuations to LV Strip companies, at least until 2008. At the same time, common sense will tell you that in times of economic and geopolitical distress, gamblers and other travelers stay closer to home. This is what happened after 9/11, after various natural disasters, outbreak of war, disease and anything else that captured the attention of America.

That being said, there are certain pockets of the United States which have just too many gaming positions in too small of an area, sharing feeder markets and resulting in lower returns for many different operators and states. We tend to pick on the eastern part of the United States mainly because that is where many states realized the party was going to end soon and had to jump on the gaming bandwagon, casino executives failed to accurately forecast what might happen and gaming regulators and political officials showed their complete lack of knowledge of anything to do with the gaming industry or human nature. Build it and they will come worked as long as the there were untapped feeder markets. Too many states legalized casino gambling in the feeder markets to keep the money from crossing the border and racetrack and casino operators were only too happy to allow them to tax them to death.

We believe the best markets in 2009 will be Missouri, Pennsylvania, Louisiana and Iowa while the worst performing markets, at least in the first half of the year will be Illinois, Atlantic City, the locals market of Las Vegas and the same store Southern Indiana casinos. While Las Vegas and Colorado will start out the year in poor shape, the second half of the year could be a lot better. Illinois and Colorado will have the anniversary of their smoking bans but a combination of the weak economy and any type of unsettled weather could continue their string of double digit declines in the first half of the year. Colorado will have the advantage of having higher betting limits and new casino games in the second half of the year, giving them a lift off of those weak comps. Illinois will be completing the auctioning of the 10th casino license and quite frankly, we can’t understand how any Chicagoland operator would even consider putting a dime into anything other than necessary capex. All the Chicagoland operators will suffer if another casino is developed in the area, just like the Casino Queen and Alton Belle will continue to suffer as St. Louis casinos ramp up marketing and business now that the loss limit has been removed.

Missouri probably is the brightest spot in the gaming universe right now. When we pushed to get the $500 loss limit removed, we said that we felt it would justify the development of such a lavish Lumiere Place in St. Louis by Pinnacle Entertainment and in Kansas City, it would help them offset the onset of competition from Kansas casinos in 2009. There will not be any Kansas casinos in operation in 2009 competing with the Kansas City casinos and right now we could be looking at 2010 or further out if we have them at all. We fully expect the end result in Kansas will either be only two or three operating casinos over the next three years, as any move to change the gambling law to give incentive to get the racetracks to open again and add slots or get more operators interested will be met with resistance by politicians. The result is that Missouri is the gaming market right now in the best shape going into 2009, followed by Louisiana and Iowa.

What happened in Kansas is a strong message to any politicians who believe state owned casinos are the way to go. What has happened in the United States in the past few years between the expansion of gaming and the destruction of our financial system has not killed the Golden Goose called casino gambling but has definitely put it in intensive care. That being said, investors will have to work a bit harder to make money in this industry as the gaming stocks turn back to recovery mode.

It should have been clear that the reaction to 3rd quarter earnings was a good sign that the bottom was being put in on many gaming stocks. The problem with investing in gaming, or pretty much any sector in 2008, was that every time it looked like capitulation or signs of a bottom and reversal, another unforeseen event occurred sending the overall stock market into another sickening fall. As we head into the end of 2008 there are clear signs of stabilization although the overall catalyst for the U.S. stock market is still lacking.

In terms of gaming stocks, we feel investors will have to play the recovery wisely and we have decided to break up this year’s portfolio into different sections. The first is basically the balance sheet, the casino companies in the best fiscal shape to maneuver through the final months of the downturn in this market. These next few months will result in various bankruptcies, most likely the majority being companies who do not have publicly traded equity. While Trump Entertainment is the likely candidate to be the publicly traded casino company to be the first to file Chapter 11, it is not like there are not others out there who need the economy to either improve or at least stabilize so they are completely out of the woods.

We know our comments will probably be repeated in many places and misquoted but the publicly traded company with the most chance of being forced into Chapter 11 or even worse due to a casino project is MGM Mirage with CityCenter. We are looking at a worst case scenario here but the way we see it is, if this current economic funk lasts to the long end of our range at 18 more months, CityCenter will open into an even worse economic climate than Palazzo and Encore. If this does occur, MGM will be forced to either cannibalize their existing properties to give CityCenter a fighting chance or disaster will strike. Either way it would not be a good thing for MGM. We hope that the low end of our economic improvement timeline (6 months) is what really happens and the billions of dollars being spent by our government to fix these problems do the trick. If that happens, we may have the complete opposite and CityCenter will then be the catalyst that turns Las Vegas around. History is not on our side regarding this as it was always Steve Wynn owned casino openings that started the last few up cycles in LV casinos.

Those few companies with strong balance sheets may use the upcoming peak of the downturn to their advantage. If more bankruptcies occur and other companies try to stave off bankruptcy with a sale of assets, a lack of financing availability could result in fire sale prices on some of these assets. Those with either strong balance sheets or management teams of companies who can find sugar daddies can use this to build up their companies and prepare for the rebound, bigger and stronger than before. At the same time, those forced to sell at these low valuations and are successful at avoiding disaster will still enter the recovery a lot smaller and weaker than they were 18-24 months ago.

The second type of casino companies we are looking at favorably are the few that have growth prospects. Not surprisingly, these companies primarily have operations in Missouri, Louisiana, and/or Colorado, the markets we are looking at favorably in 2009.

Despite being dragged down by a view that when your customers are hurting, you must be too, the suppliers to this industry are on the whole, in fine financial shape. Even IGT, beaten up and bruised by failed investments and market share losses, still throws off enough cash flow that they should easily be able to retire their convertible debt when it gets put to them. Bally Technologies and WMS are in share repurchase and free cash flow mode with Bally refinancing their debt at a reasonable rate during the height of the financing market deep freeze. Shuffle Master, criticized for raising the money to retire their convert a year in advance now look like a geniuse for doing it before the financial markets went into a tail spin. It seems that only Progressive Gaming and possibly FutureLogic are ending 2008 in worse shape than they started. PGIC is basically on the brink of a restructuring, a liquidation or a fire sale, the only supplier company that became a victim of the casino crunch. FutureLogic somehow got the short end of the litigation battle with TransAct Technologies and although the terms were not disclosed, we should get a handle on them when TACT files their annual 10K. Either way, judging by the recent earnings report from TACT, they have gained market share on FutureLogic and it appears that FutureLogic has had to rethink their strategy.

Everyone knows that the biggest gains in gaming stocks can be found when companies rebound. Historically this has been primarily on the supplier side as anyone who has been investing in this group for a long period of time remembers the profits that were made investing in Bally, WMS and Progressive Gaming early in their recovery. Many probably don’t know that in the past 20 years, IGT has gone from under $10 a share to well over $40 a share twice on a recovery from a decline in business and market share. Only one time in modern day gaming stock history has there been anything similar to this in the casino stocks and that was in the mid-1990’s when casino stocks plunged 60%-90% on fears of oversupply, overbuilding and bankruptcies. This occurred in the first stage of the riverboat and regional gaming expansion. The difference between then and now is that while the equity prices of companies such as Ameristar Casinos, Argosy Gaming, Casino Magic, Casino America (now Isle of Capri Casinos), Hollywood Park (now Pinnacle Entertainment) and others plunged 75% or more from their highs, their bonds remained strong. This is a different environment now with bond investors showing they think there is at least a 50% chance that most of the casino companies do not make it without a restructuring, which would be a disaster for equity holders.

What this means is that the risk is higher now but most likely so will be the rewards if you pick the correct stocks. If you purchase five of the casino stocks currently trading under $10 a share and only one stages a dramatic recovery, three wind up getting gobbled up by another company around the current valuation or just stays at that price and only one goes under, you’ve done very well for yourself.

The final section of course, will be the speculative section. With stock prices where they are, speculative no longer means low priced since just about every stock is now low priced, with the exception of stocks like Google and Berkshire Hathaway. Our Speculative section is for companies that are low priced, are not in dire financial shape but are being ignored by investors, or have been trampled by investors and have potential catalysts in place. On the supplier side it is the ones who supply or service the slot makers because if we feel the slot makers can do better than the way their stock prices are reflecting, it is a good chance that their suppliers will also rebound. On the casino side, there are companies out there who have new projects, are not in financial straits and also have a history of making investors money when purchased on the down and out.

In terms of weighting, remember that things will change as the year unfolds. Going into 2009 we would give a heavier weighting to the companies with the stronger balance sheets, the companies with better growth prospects and the suppliers. We would have a lower weighting on rebound names and of course, not more than 10% in speculative names. Remember that the rebound and speculative names could have a greater return due to the higher risk and lower prices and as always, we suggest you take profits on extreme moves in any of these stocks while holding a core position. We expect the volatility in the overall market that was seen in the second half of 2008 to continue through the first half of 2009.


Good Luck and Profitable Investing!!

Subscribers Only…Click Here to View The Most Recent Update to The Portfolio.

To Order This Year's Complete Report Click Here

Copyright © 2004 Gaming USA Corp.
Site Design & Development by Nutmeg Interactive
Privacy Policy    Terms & Conditions    Code of Conduct


PO Box 1396 Paramus, New Jersey 07653-1396 - Phone: 1-800-990-1902 Fax: 201-967-7152